Ohio · verified through August 25, 2026

Ohio: law status and evidence context.

Law status, direct attached-library attribution, and public enforcement context are shown separately. A zero direct total does not mean no enforcement exists.

OH · 6 requirements mapped / control outcomes supported

Law status

No verified general comprehensive law

No comprehensive consumer privacy law verified

Official name / citation
n.a.
Status / effective date
n.a.
Principal enforcer
Ohio Attorney General

Direct attached-library attribution

0 cases · $0

These totals are assigned solely by the attachment’s state heading. Shared multistate totals are not allocated in full to every state.

The attached library does not enumerate participant-level allocations for every multistate matter; shared settlement totals are presented once at the national level and are not duplicated into state totals.

Official law sources

Other generally applicable PII law

Ohio Rev. Code § 1349.19 (breach notification) - https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-1349.19 ; safe-harbour cybersecurity program law, Ohio Rev. Code §§ 1354.01-1354.05

Public enforcement context

Tier 1

Marriott International, Inc.

$52 million total; Ohio share stated as more than $1.5 million · October 9, 2024

Ohio joined the 50-AG Marriott settlement over a multi-year breach affecting 131.5 million guest records.

Legal basis: State consumer protection laws

Official case source (opens in a new tab)

Mapped control outcomes

1 personal data inventory/data map; 2 sensitive-data discovery; 3 downstream copy tracking; 8 breach blast-radius analysis; 9 retention/minimization; 10 regulator audit evidence

Kestryl can evidence where regulated personal data actually resides across structured stores and unstructured attachments/images, produce audit rows and evidence packs showing when each location was discovered and reviewed, and apply structured-data remediation modes (mask, vault, strip) to reduce exposure. It does not alter source attachments or documents, and its output is technical evidence supporting controls, not proof of legal compliance.