Montana · verified through August 25, 2026

Montana: law status and evidence context.

Law status, direct attached-library attribution, and public enforcement context are shown separately. A zero direct total does not mean no enforcement exists.

MT · 6 requirements mapped / control outcomes supported

Law status

Verified comprehensive law

Yes - Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act

Official name / citation
Mont. Code Ann. §§ 30-14-2801 to 30-14-2820 (SB 384, Ch. 681, Laws of 2023)
Status / effective date
Codified in MCA 2025; effective October 1, 2024 per the official legislative memo
Principal enforcer
Montana Attorney General (Office of Consumer Protection)

Direct attached-library attribution

0 cases · $0

These totals are assigned solely by the attachment’s state heading. Shared multistate totals are not allocated in full to every state.

The attached library does not enumerate participant-level allocations for every multistate matter; shared settlement totals are presented once at the national level and are not duplicated into state totals.

Official law sources

Other generally applicable PII law

Also: Mont. Code Ann. § 30-14-1704 (breach notification) - https://dojmt.gov/office-of-consumer-protection/reporting-requirements-for-data-breaches/

Public enforcement context

Tier 1

Blackbaud, Inc.

$49.5 million total; Montana share stated as $388,649 · n.a. (date not stated on page)

Montana joined the 50-state Blackbaud settlement over the 2020 breach affecting Montana organizations.

Legal basis: State consumer protection laws, breach-notification laws and HIPAA

Official case source (opens in a new tab)

Mapped control outcomes

1 personal data inventory/data map; 2 sensitive-data discovery; 3 downstream copy tracking; 8 breach blast-radius analysis; 9 retention/minimization; 10 regulator audit evidence

Kestryl can evidence where regulated personal data actually resides across structured stores and unstructured attachments/images, produce audit rows and evidence packs showing when each location was discovered and reviewed, and apply structured-data remediation modes (mask, vault, strip) to reduce exposure. It does not alter source attachments or documents, and its output is technical evidence supporting controls, not proof of legal compliance.