Law status
Verified comprehensive law
Yes - Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act
- Official name / citation
- Minn. Stat. §§ 325M.10-325M.21
- Status / effective date
- Codified; the revisor page states a July 2025 effective date (exact day not captured in the fetched excerpt)
- Principal enforcer
- Minnesota Attorney General
Direct attached-library attribution
0 cases · $0
These totals are assigned solely by the attachment’s state heading. Shared multistate totals are not allocated in full to every state.
The attached library does not enumerate participant-level allocations for every multistate matter; shared settlement totals are presented once at the national level and are not duplicated into state totals.
Official law sources
- Official state source (opens in a new tab)
- Official state source (opens in a new tab)
- Official state source (opens in a new tab)
Other generally applicable PII law
Also: Minn. Stat. § 325E.61 (breach notice) - https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/325e.61
Public enforcement context
Tier 1*
Blackbaud, Inc.
$49.5 million total payment to the states (do not infer a state share unless quoted below) · October 5, 2023
The AGs alleged Blackbaud failed to implement reasonable data security and to remediate known gaps before a 2020 ransomware incident, and failed to give customers timely, complete or accurate breach information. Minnesota is named among the participating jurisdictions on the Illinois AG page; the Minnesota share is not stated there.
Legal basis: State consumer protection laws, state breach-notification laws and HIPAA (as alleged by the AGs)
Mapped control outcomes
1 personal data inventory/data map; 2 sensitive-data discovery; 3 downstream copy tracking; 8 breach blast-radius analysis; 9 retention/minimization; 10 regulator audit evidence
Kestryl can evidence where regulated personal data actually resides across structured stores and unstructured attachments/images, produce audit rows and evidence packs showing when each location was discovered and reviewed, and apply structured-data remediation modes (mask, vault, strip) to reduce exposure. It does not alter source attachments or documents, and its output is technical evidence supporting controls, not proof of legal compliance.
Educational information, not legal advice. The supplied snapshot is dated August 25, 2026; confirm current law, applicability, exceptions, official status, and reporting decisions with qualified counsel and the relevant authority.