Maryland · verified through August 25, 2026

Maryland: law status and evidence context.

Law status, direct attached-library attribution, and public enforcement context are shown separately. A zero direct total does not mean no enforcement exists.

MD · 6 requirements mapped / control outcomes supported

Law status

Verified comprehensive law

Yes - Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024

Official name / citation
Md. Code, Com. Law §§ 14-4601 to 14-4614 (Ch. 454 (HB 567) / Ch. 455 (SB 541))
Status / effective date
Enacted; effective October 1, 2025 per the enrolled chapter
Principal enforcer
Maryland Attorney General (Consumer Protection Division)

Direct attached-library attribution

0 cases · $0

These totals are assigned solely by the attachment’s state heading. Shared multistate totals are not allocated in full to every state.

The attached library does not enumerate participant-level allocations for every multistate matter; shared settlement totals are presented once at the national level and are not duplicated into state totals.

Official law sources

Other generally applicable PII law

Also: Md. Code, Com. Law § 14-3504 (breach notification) - https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/laws/StatuteText?article=gcl&section=14-3504&enactments=False&archived=False

Public enforcement context

Tier 1

23andMe (bankruptcy claims)

$18 million state recovery (of $150 million allowed claims) · July 14, 2026

Maryland joined the 42-AG 23andMe settlement; the Maryland AG page does not state a Maryland share.

Legal basis: State privacy/consumer-protection claims in bankruptcy

Official case source (opens in a new tab)

Mapped control outcomes

1 personal data inventory/data map; 2 sensitive-data discovery; 3 downstream copy tracking; 8 breach blast-radius analysis; 9 retention/minimization; 10 regulator audit evidence

Kestryl can evidence where regulated personal data actually resides across structured stores and unstructured attachments/images, produce audit rows and evidence packs showing when each location was discovered and reviewed, and apply structured-data remediation modes (mask, vault, strip) to reduce exposure. It does not alter source attachments or documents, and its output is technical evidence supporting controls, not proof of legal compliance.