Iowa · verified through August 25, 2026

Iowa: law status and evidence context.

Law status, direct attached-library attribution, and public enforcement context are shown separately. A zero direct total does not mean no enforcement exists.

IA · 6 requirements mapped / control outcomes supported

Law status

Verified comprehensive law

Yes - Consumer Data Protections

Official name / citation
Iowa Code ch. 715D, §§ 715D.1-715D.9
Status / effective date
Codified in the 2025 Iowa Code
Principal enforcer
Iowa Attorney General

Direct attached-library attribution

0 cases · $0

These totals are assigned solely by the attachment’s state heading. Shared multistate totals are not allocated in full to every state.

The attached library does not enumerate participant-level allocations for every multistate matter; shared settlement totals are presented once at the national level and are not duplicated into state totals.

Official law sources

Other generally applicable PII law

Also: Personal Information Security Breach Protection, Iowa Code ch. 715C - https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/code/2026/715C.html

Public enforcement context

Tier 1

Marriott International, Inc.

$52 million to the states; Iowa share stated as $594,105 · October 9, 2024

Iowa joined the 50-AG Marriott settlement; the Iowa AG page enumerates all participating states.

Legal basis: State consumer protection, personal-information protection and breach-notification laws

Official case source (opens in a new tab)

Mapped control outcomes

1 personal data inventory/data map; 2 sensitive-data discovery; 3 downstream copy tracking; 8 breach blast-radius analysis; 9 retention/minimization; 10 regulator audit evidence

Kestryl can evidence where regulated personal data actually resides across structured stores and unstructured attachments/images, produce audit rows and evidence packs showing when each location was discovered and reviewed, and apply structured-data remediation modes (mask, vault, strip) to reduce exposure. It does not alter source attachments or documents, and its output is technical evidence supporting controls, not proof of legal compliance.