Georgia · verified through August 25, 2026

Georgia: law status and evidence context.

Law status, direct attached-library attribution, and public enforcement context are shown separately. A zero direct total does not mean no enforcement exists.

GA · 6 requirements mapped / control outcomes supported

Law status

No verified general comprehensive law

No comprehensive consumer privacy law verified (SB 473 was a pending bill)

Official name / citation
n.a.
Status / effective date
Bill only
Principal enforcer
Georgia Attorney General

Direct attached-library attribution

0 cases · $0

These totals are assigned solely by the attachment’s state heading. Shared multistate totals are not allocated in full to every state.

The attached library does not enumerate participant-level allocations for every multistate matter; shared settlement totals are presented once at the national level and are not duplicated into state totals.

Official law sources

Other generally applicable PII law

Georgia Personal Identity Protection Act, O.C.G.A. §§ 10-1-911, 10-1-912 (breach notification) - https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/legislation/document/20072008/72301 (bill as passed Senate; codified text not fetched)

Public enforcement context

Tier 1

23andMe (bankruptcy claims)

$150 million allowed claims; $18 million recovery; Georgia share stated as $452,232 · July 14, 2026

Georgia joined the 42-AG 23andMe settlement over the 2023 genetic-data breach.

Legal basis: State privacy/consumer-protection claims in bankruptcy

Official case source (opens in a new tab)

Mapped control outcomes

1 personal data inventory/data map; 2 sensitive-data discovery; 3 downstream copy tracking; 8 breach blast-radius analysis; 9 retention/minimization; 10 regulator audit evidence

Kestryl can evidence where regulated personal data actually resides across structured stores and unstructured attachments/images, produce audit rows and evidence packs showing when each location was discovered and reviewed, and apply structured-data remediation modes (mask, vault, strip) to reduce exposure. It does not alter source attachments or documents, and its output is technical evidence supporting controls, not proof of legal compliance.